Blog‎ > ‎

Is Paula Deen the Worst, Most Dangerous and Unethical Person in America? By Larry Kahaner

posted Jan 24, 2012 7:50 AM by Jacqueline Lara
    Paula Deen’s admission that she suffers from Type 2 Diabetes should shock no one. Considering that her TV show features such delectables as Paula’s Brunch Burger which consists of a fried egg and bacon atop a burger served between glazed doughnuts instead of a bun, I’m surprised that she’s still alive. 

    To me, however, Deen’s story also is about business and brand ethics and her breach of these tenets.
    Responses from viewers, reviewers, other chefs, and even her own TV colleagues, are all over the map.
Some, like Anthony Bourdain call her the “worst, most dangerous person in America.” Others defend Deen. “She feels like she cooks for ‘real people,’ and for better or worse, that is how many people in this country choose to eat,” writes Virginia Willis, a food writer in Atlanta, Georgia.

    People are angry with Deen on so many levels that it’s difficult to parse. Some chide her for keeping her diabetes a secret while promoting a cooking style that contributes to that illness. Others say she acted unethically by keeping her illness hidden while cutting a deal with an insulin maker. Still others say that she blatantly uses her celebrity status to promote poor diets in the name of wealth, (she makes about $10 million annually) and doesn’t care about any fallout. Another group of detractors are livid about her backpedaling strategy only now claiming that she has always preached moderation in eating her artery-clogging recipes.

    Paula Deen has a powerful brand. She has a bully pulpit and a large audience who trust and believe in her. At the very least, she entices people on a regular basis to eat unhealthily. Even those who don’t particularly care for her demeanor, cuisine or flip attitude toward unhealthy food, were tempted by her congenial and friendly persona that celebrated excess. She snubbed her nose at organic foodies and encouraged butter and fat laden foods with an anti-intellectual and anti-science attitude of ‘what do nutritionists know?’

    What many celebrities like Deen fail to understand is that they have pull with people and that means they also have a responsibility to act ethically, honestly and in the best interests of those who admire them.

    I realize that this places a large – and some might say unfair -- onus on those in the limelight. I believe, however, that it comes with the job. It’s a de facto burden and those with followers should take it seriously. Is it realistic to think that all celebrities will be perfect role models? No, we’re all human and we make mistakes in judgment. Also, there are those celebs who claim that they owe their audiences nothing but a great performance. Their off-stage life is their own concern. This may be true for those stars who keep a low personal profile, but for those celebs who are out there every day, pushing a persona, a lifestyle, a brand, and a way of living like Paula Deen, they have an ethical responsibility to send a healthy, honest and positive message about how to live. (Take note, Charlie Sheen.)
Celebrities are selling products -- themselves. Like it or not Paula, your loyal fans –as misguided as they may be - believe what you say and do.
You have done damage, and now it’s your job to fix it.


The William G. McGowan Charitable Fund provides grants in three program areas including Health care and Medical Research; Education, and Community Programs for Those Most Vulnerable. It gives priority to programs that have demonstrated success, measurable outcomes, have a plan for sustainability, and aim to end cycles of poverty and suffering.